I was recently asked to comment on an article about the
role of corporate diversity offices. The article, written by John Fitzgerald
Gates, Ph.D., ran in the Huffington Post and was entitled, “Do We Really Need
Diversity Offices?” A link to the
article can be found at the end.
Diversity practitioners in recent years have begun
referring to diversity as inclusion. The
premise behind this thinking is that if diversity is sometimes about counting
people then inclusion is about making people count. Counting people is clearly a function of EEO
and affirmative action. However, in recent years I continue to hear the term
diversity with respect to counting people.
This led me to agree with the conclusions drawn by Gates the article. Last year I received a call from one of my
clients who is a multi-national corporation headquartered in Europe. The caller was from the European headquarters
and she was inquiring if I could do a diversity plan for that office since I do
similar plans for offices in the United States.
The plans I “do” for the U.S. offices are affirmative action plans,
which are written according to specific regulations. They are about counting and categorizing
people in accordance with specific requirements. I explained to the caller how I went about
the analysis for this plan and that the methodology was not universal since it
involves using U.S. Census data.
Diversity is about uniqueness. Diversity is what makes
each and every one of us a unique individual. We each possess unique
characteristics and qualities that we bring and contribute to the organization
for which we work.
Diversity relates to people's values. Diversity also
relates to an organizations values. Individuals want to work in an environment
where others care about them and where they feel accepted and respected. Diversity is about culture, both individual
culture, and that's only one of the reasons why it's a business issue.
Gates says that we are stuck in seeing diversity within
its limited definition of human difference. I'm not sure that I would interpret
difference as limiting. Rather I interpret difference as uniqueness. Diversity extends beyond what is obvious
about people, those primary dimensions of diversity such as age gender race
etc. Diversity encompasses much more including our backgrounds as education,
religious believes, work experiences, geographic differences and also cultural
variables. Despite the fact that we live
in a world that is global, the cultural variables or so often overlooked.
I do agree with the conclusions that Gates made. We have
to unlearn our old mental models in which we see diversity as counting people
and celebrate excellence and uniqueness.
When we do this we can celebrate differences and recognize that
diversity has a place and affects all aspects of the organization – learning,
resource allocation, product development and innovation, leadership integrity and
even the bottom line. That's the business case for diversity that Mary-Jane
Sinclair SPHR was trying to make so many years ago.
A link to the article is below. As you read it, think about the song by Sly
and the Family Stone, “Everyday People”. Those lyrics define what diversity is
all about.
No comments:
Post a Comment